http://libreddit.qwik.i2p/r/entertainment/comments/wrzcz2/courtroom_bombshell_r_kellys_former_goddaughter/ikvegot
Throughout her testimony, she claimed forceful penetration upon her by Depp, with a bottle, but never directly accused him of rape or abuse, rather described his actions. It was the forensic physician and the expert psychologists that direct said “yes this is IPV” or “yes this action is responsible for this injury” Heard, while the victim, is not “supposed” to accuse him of the verdict “being raped/abused” directly It’s totally semantics yes, but often witnesses can have other evidence...